Download Now Download to read offline and view in fullscreen. Download Now Download Download to read offline. Marine Study. Chairil Anam Follow. CBA Assesment Guidelines. IMO Model Course 6. IMO Model Course 1. CD Basic Fire Fighting. What to Upload to SlideShare.
Related Books Free with a 30 day trial from Scribd. Dry: A Memoir Augusten Burroughs. Related Audiobooks Free with a 30 day trial from Scribd. Empath Up! Ahmad Al Qudah. Views Total views. Actions Shares. No notes for slide. Total views On Slideshare 0. From embeds 0. Number of embeds Downloads Shares 0. Comments 0. Likes 1. Checking plan for safety 0.
Check a previously created and saved route for crossing A2 7. Check the route as it is being created for dangers as listed A5 above Assess a route plan based on a safety check Ex.
Determine the force and direction of the true wind A2 7. Display the ocean climate wind vectors and lines of equal wave A3 B7 height, selected by month A4 Display the dynamics of surface currents A5 Determine the tidal rise and tidal currents Use Current option in calculating a Route Plan Schedule Determine bottom type and assess anchor holding ground from information obtained on an appropriately scaled chart Route schedule 0.
Observe any deviation from the route schedule setting in use as A2 T3 ch. Determine expected passage times A4 B7 Observe calculations of progress along the planned route A5 User charts in route planning 1. Determine effective policy regarding User Charts A4 Select User Chart for display A5 Use the graphic editor for creating and modifying a User Chart ARPA tracked target overlay 0.
Access target info display A5 AIS functions 0. Access target info display options Interpret AIS target symbol features Radar overlay RIB functions 0. Describe the technical function of the radar integrator board A2 T3 ch. Examine the main functions of the radar integrator board A4 Operate the user interface controls for radar overlay A5 B7 Demonstrate sources of image offset Review chart data structure, terminology, and installation A2 T3 ch.
Examine data distribution sources for ENC A5 Examine data distribution sources for SENC conversions Examine license structure for various formats, and practice installation Extract information on installation history Installing chart corrections 1. Explain why electronic chart data is maintained with up-to-date A2 6. Add or modify a chart object using Manual Correction task A4 B7 Examine production license options for accessibility of automatic A5 updates Install various automatic update formats using various methods Extract information on update history Ex.
Recognize consequences to navigation safety while troubleshooting, Data logging and logbook 1. Examine display functions of ownship track and tracks of AIS, A3 Perform various hard copy print outs A5 Playback 0. Explain that no route or route plan is securely associated with A3 any playback A4 Explain that no chart data is securely associated with any A5 playback Perform a playback of an event or passage specified by date and time Closely observe the position and heading update interval in Playback Responsibility 1.
Re-examine IMO approval of equipment and installations R6 Re-examine IMO carriage requirements R7 Re-examine flag state maritime implementation Re-examine IMO training Guidance and providing review of course Re-examine sample bridge operating procedures addressing 8. The detailed teaching syllabus Part C must be studied carefully and, where appropriate, lesson plans or lecture notes compiled with Part D providing the basis from beginning to end of the course. The written and practical exam content and methods are detailed in Part E.
The lesson plans and exercises of this part are meant to provide the ECDIS navigation instructor with the material for a course instruction manual. Specifically, the Learning Objectives presented in the previous parts of the Model Course document are fleshed out in considerable detail in Part D.
The details of this part reflect the views of the course developers with respect to methodology and organization as well as what they consider relevant and important in light of their experience as instructors and as navigator who have succeeded in applying ECDIS to bridge watchstanding. It is particularly important for the instructor to adapt content to the specific ECDIS being utilized in the training environment. Adaptation is also advised for review of flag state regulations, as appropriate.
As noted in the foregoing parts, this hour course is comprised of 40 Lesson Plans, 4 practice exercises, and a final underway assessment exercise. Availability and proper use of course materials is also essential for maximum efficacy in conveying the subject to trainees.
The capabilities and limitations of the teaching facilities in use may dictate that the learning objectives be adjusted but it is suggested that this be kept to a minimum. Due to the considerable challenges and complexities faced by trainees learning to navigate safely using ECDIS, it is vital for the instructor to recognize that successful underway assessments require as much hands-on practice as possible.
As discussed in the Introduction to the navigational use of ECDIS Edition , lecturing and demonstration and the opportunity for individual use applies to nearly all learning objectives in nearly all topics. Whenever an ECDIS unit must be shared amongst trainees, the quality of learning is critically degraded, and leads to likely failure in the final underway assessment.
It will, therefore, be necessary for instructors to prepare for the presentation of specific learning objective in the context of underway scenarios for both classroom demonstration and practice, and for the solo navigation environment. The development of other materials, such as a compilation on a CD of handy reference material, is also strongly suggested.
Proficiency in the use of ECDIS includes assessing the integrity of the system and all data at all times. Simulation exercise — open sea 2. Explain that only information stored as objects with corresponding attributes in the database is available for display.
Describe the chart data selected for display. Assess all errors, inaccuracies and ambiguities caused by improper data management. Explain the need and requirement that electronic chart data must be systematically updated for safe navigation. Explain the need for selecting sensor data displayed in ECDIS that is appropriate and unambiguous, and accurate. Select between primary and secondary position source.
Observe automatic change over to secondary position source. Identify the data port assigned to each connected sensor Assess the impact on displayed information when a sensor port is improperly selected.
Explain and analyze the data and chart alarms resulting from overscaling zooming in and underscaling zooming out Demonstrate how the presentation of navigation marks is changed according to ownship's position Demonstrate errors of interpretation by the incorrect selection of display categories Select the sea areas and the required waters for planning the whole passage.
Construct a route plan by inputting waypoint data alphanumerically into a route-planning table. Adjust the route plan by editing, adding and deleting waypoints inside the table. Adjust the route by graphically editing waypoints. Display the ocean climate wind vectors and lines of equal wave height, selected by month. Use Current option in calculating a Route Plan Schedule. Determine bottom type and assess anchor holding ground from information obtained on an appropriately scaled chart.
Observe any deviation from the route schedule setting in use as vessel is proceeding along a route Create, save and move an anchor circle guard zone as a User Chart.
Simulation exercise — coastal waters 2. Radar overlay functions 0. Installing charts data 1. Data logging and logbook voyage recording 1. Determine speed and heading inputs used in ARPA tracked target data calculations Simulation exercise — confined waters 2. V Reg. S registered vessels. Future impacts on insurance and liability are possible.
It is consistent with the intent of STCW that demonstration of skills and practical understanding is determined by direct observation, while knowledge and theoretical understand is determined through written examination in a variety of question styles. This will be particularly appropriate for the Proficiency Checklist that follows in this Part. The specific tasks of that document should, in fact, be used as a method to validate the transference and transferability of skills between one specific ECDIS unit and another.
It is well suited to the classroom or open lab training environment. The Simulation Checklist, on the other hand, provides a less specific method, but no less focused, more suitable for evaluating and scoring underway skill sets during solo navigation exercises. For a more specific approach to scoring ECDIS proficiencies, a sample score sheet and associated tally sheet are provided. These rely on the grouping of tasks introduced through the Simulation Checklist.
ECDIS 2. Verify settings of interfaced sensors Check that settings conform to 3. Verify position by alternate means 6. Criteria for evaluating competence: Information obtained from ECDIS is correctly interpreted and analyzed taking into account the limitations of the equipment and prevailing circumstances and conditions.
Alarm parameters for areas, anti-grounding, contacts, time functions b. Completeness of chart data, chart licensing status, and chart update status c. Sea area b. Position c. Navigation information d. Route monitoring e. Chart information f. Contact information g. Sea area display, mode and orientation b. Chart display categories c. Chart selection, scale, and automatic functions d.
User-created information layers f. AIS interface functions g. Sample score sheet — The sample score sheet shown below is meant for each trainee in the underway evaluation.
In that instance, the trainee should retake the evaluation because it is always plausible that better use of ECDIS would have mitigated the dangers related to close quarters and proximity to shoal water.
An important consideration used in this scoring scheme is to avoid a penalty for un-scored tasks, unless the entire Task Group is un-scored. The scoring could be kept simple with the use of integers, or decimal values could be used for finer differentiation. Consistency in either case is essential.
The values recorded in the underway score sheet are applied in the evaluation tally with weighted averages for each Task Group. The intent is to provide a flexible scoring system in the event that certain devices are not included in the integrated simulation. On the other hand, simply entering a zero value in place of a blank will cause that entry to be included in the average, significantly penalizing omitted behaviors, and rendering the scoring system far more rigorous.
Such a choice should be left to the training course developer, and should not be directly dictated by a scoring system. The formulation here yields to the scorer 0 or blank. For example, certain Task Groups may show under-performance over several iterations, indicating the need for revised emphasis of certain tasks in the underway context. Likewise, the overall score for the evaluation exercise can be determined and tracked.
Eliminate the need to use paper charts. Reduce the number of persons on the bridge. Contribute to safe navigation d. Computerize shipboard navigation C — PS 1. Simple and reliable updating of the ENC b. Reducing navigational workload c. Providing appropriate alarms or indications d. All of the above. Positional navigation sensors e. Track control autopilot d. The hydrographic office issuing the ENC data b.
The mariner d. All of the above C — PS 2. The ENC b. The SENC c. Official updates in digital format D — PS 2. ENC — database issued by hydrographic office that contains all chart info needed for safe navigation; may contain supplemental info [PS 2. What is the difference between Standard Display and a Display Base? Examples: Standard Display [PS 3. What is the difference between an Indication and an Alarm? In the Route Planning Mode, what are the four primary ways to adjust a planned route?
Adding waypoints 2. Deleting waypoints 3. Changing the position of waypoints 4. Selected route 2. In terms of voyage recording, what are two major types of data that must be recorded at one-minute intervals during the previous 12 hours?
Record of official data used e. Safe navigation for remaining part of voyage [PS Selected from depth contours provided; more emphasis shown bold than other contours [PS 3. Hydrography b. Ferry routes c. Regulatory boundaries d. All of the above ECDIS warnings and messages b. Hydrographic Office data c. Notice to Mariners information d. Notice to Mariners information b.
ECDIS warnings and messages c. Ship hydrodynamic information d. Hydrographic Office data Display base information b. Standard display information c. System electronic navigational chart d. System electronic nautical chart d. Chart display information ECDIS must give an alarm for which of the following cases? When the specified limit for deviation from the planned route is exceeded b.
If the ship, within a specified time set by the watch officer, is going to cross a safety contour c. If the ship, within a specified time set by the watch officer, is going to cross the boundary of a prohibited area d. If the ship is going to reach a critical point on the planned route b.
When the speed of a dangerous target exceeds a set limit c. If the ship's ETA has changed beyond the set limit d. When the speed of a dangerous target exceeds a set limit b. When the specified limit for deviation from the planned route is exceeded c. None of the above International Maritime Organization b.
International Hydrographic Organization c. NASA d. US Coast Guard Radar targets b. ARPA vectors c. Hydrographic data d. Position b. Electronic navigational chart source c.
Course made good history d. Soundings b. Waypoints c. Meteorological data d. Radar targets Water temperature b. Climatology data c. Speed of advance d. Depth contours Course made good history b. Estimated time of arrival c. Speed through the water d. Shaft RPM Determine true bearing and distance between two geographical points b.
Determine magnetic compass deviation c. Transform a local datum to the WGS-'84 datum d. Convert "graphical coordinates" to "display coordinates" Conversion of "graphical coordinates" to "display coordinates" b. Transformation of local datum to WGS-'84 datum c. Calculation of true azimuth and distance between two geographical points d. Mark the test. Which of the following is a performance standard for the display of SENC information? Information contained in the Display Base can be easily removed from the display.
The selected safety depth is always displayed, even with spot soundings turned off. The selected safety contour is displayed with greater emphasis than other contours. When a chart is first displayed, the Standard Display at the smallest scale is presented. Identify the orientation and mode of display required by the Performance Standards.
North-up orientation and true motion mode. Overwriting of the track file every 24 hours. Any orientation in either true or relative mode.
Which of the following reflects the statement that ECDIS only supports the mariner in performing navigational tasks? ECDIS does not take the place of a proper lookout. Manual corrections constitute user information layers, added by the mariner, with no automatic record of installation. When U. Notice to Mariners are downloaded from the NGA website, the. Radar overlay and chart data may appear to be mismatched. If it is thought or known that floating aids to navigation buoys have shifted, how should this be interpreted on ECDIS?
ECDIS always shows the actual location of buoys. Physical buoy positions may differ from charted locations on ECDIS, as with any type of chart information. Buoy position changes are never included in ENC updates. Chart scale may be misrepresented. Chart features may not be shown in the intended color.
0コメント